Doctoral thesis on

Doctoral thesis on

A thesis is a paper that is written from an idea controlling the written matter. A thesis statement should be the back bone around which you construct the rest of your thesis paper. The thesis statement declares what you believe and what you intent to prove in the paper. A good thesis statement makes the difference between a thoughtful research Aug 30,  · Thesis and dissertation, both require intense editing and critical proof reading before final submission. Dissertation vs. Thesis: Europe. In Europe the original distinction between a thesis and a dissertation has been largely retained. A doctoral thesis is a focused piece of original research which is performed in order to obtain a PhD. A the·sis (thē′sĭs) n. pl. the·ses (-sēz) 1. A proposition that is maintained by argument. 2. A dissertation advancing an original point of view as a result of research, especially as a requirement for an academic degree. 3. A hypothetical proposition, especially one put forth without proof. 4. The first stage of the Hegelian dialectic process. 5

Doctoral advisor - Wikipedia

in I edited it to remove some specific references to the student and present it as a small increment to the information available to my grad students. Let's revisit the idea of the thesis itself. It is a hypothesis, a conjecture, a theorem. The dissertation is a formal, stylized document used to argue your thesis. The thesis must be significant, original no one has yet demonstrated it to be trueand it must extend the state of scientific knowledge.

The first thing you need to do is to come up with no more than three sentences that express your thesis. Your committee must agree that your statements form a valid thesis statement. You too must be happy with the statement -- it should be what you will tell anyone if they ask you what your thesis is few people will want to hear an hour presentation as a response.

Once you have a statement of thesis, you can begin to develop the dissertation. The abstract, for instance, should be a one-page description of your thesis and how you present the proof of it. The abstract should summarize the results of the thesis and should stress the contributions to science made thereby. Perhaps the best way to understand how an abstract should look would be to examine the abstracts of several dozen dissertations that have already been accepted.

Our university library has a collection of them. This is a good approach to see how an entire dissertation is structured and presented. MIT press has published the ACM doctoral dissertation award series for over a decade, so you may find some of those to be good examples to read -- they should be in any large technical library.

The dissertation itself should doctoral thesis on structured into 4 to 6 chapters. The following is one commonly-used structure:. Chapter I, Introduction. Here, you should clearly state the thesis and its importance.

This is also where you give definitions of terms and other concepts used elsewhere. There is no need to write 80 pages of background on your topic here. Instead, you can cover almost everything by saying: "The terminology used in this work matches the definitions given in [citation, citation] unless noted otherwise. The progress of science is that we learn and use the work of others with appropriate credit. Assume you have a technically literate readership familiar with or able to find common references.

Do not reference popular literature or WWW sites if you can help it this is a matter of style more than anything else -- you want to reference articles in refereed conferences and journals, if possible, or in other theses, doctoral thesis on.

Also in the introduction, you want to survey any related work that attempted something similar to your own, or that has a significant supporting role in your research. This should refer only to published references. You cite the work in the references, not the researchers themselves. Every factual statement you make doctoral thesis on have a specific citation tied to it in this chapter, or else it must be common knowledge don't rely on this too much.

Chapter II. Abstract Model. Your results doctoral thesis on to be of lasting value. Thus, the model you develop and write about and indeed, that you defend should be one that has lasting value. Thus, you should discuss a model that is not based on Windows, Linux, Ethernet, PCMIA, or any other specific technology.

It should be generic in nature, and should capture all the details necessary to overlay the model on likely environments. You should discuss the problems, parameters, requirements, doctoral thesis on, doctoral thesis on and sufficient conditions, and other factors here. Consider that 20 years ago ca the common platform was a Vax computer running VMS or a PDP running Unix version 6, yet well-crafted theses of the time are still valuable today.

Will your dissertation be valuable 20 years from now caor have you referred to technologies that will be of only historical interest? This model is tough to construct, but is really the heart of the scientific doctoral thesis on of your work. This is the lasting part of the contribution, and this is what someone might cite 50 years from now when we are all using MS Linux XXXXP on computers embedded in our wrists with subspace network links!

There doctoral thesis on basically three proof techniques that I have seen used in a computing dissertation, depending on the thesis topic. The first is analytic, where one takes the model or formulae and shows, using formal manipulations, that the model is sound and complete. A second proof method is stochastic, using some form of statistical methods and measurements to show that something is true in the anticipated cases, doctoral thesis on. Using the third method, you need to show that your thesis is true by building something according to your model and showing that it behaves as you claim it will.

This involves clearly showing how your implementation model matches the conditions of your abstract model, describing all the variables and why you set them as you do, accounting for confounding factors, and showing the results.

You must be careful to not expend too much effort describing how standard protocols and hardware work use citations to the literature, instead. You must clearly express the mapping of model to experiment, and the definition of parameters used and measured.

Chapter V. Additional results. This may be folded into Chapter III in some theses, or it may be multiple chapters in a thesis with many parts as in a theory-based thesis. This may be where you discuss the effects of technology change on your results, doctoral thesis on. This is also a place where you may wish to point out significant results that you obtained while seeking to prove your central thesis, but which are not themselves supportive of the thesis.

Often, such additional results are published in a separate paper. Chapter VI. Conclusions and Future work, doctoral thesis on. This is where you discuss what you found from your work, incidental ideas and results that were not central to your thesis but of value nonetheless, if you did not have them in Chapter V and other results.

This chapter should summarize all the important results of the dissertation note that this is the only chapter many people will ever read, so it should convey all the important results. This is also where you should outline some possible future work that can be done in the area.

What are some open problems? What are some new problems? What are some significant variations open to future inquiry? Appendices usually are present to hold mundane details that are doctoral thesis on published elsewhere, but which are critical to the development of your dissertation. This includes tables of measurement results, configuration details of experimental testbeds, limited source code listings of critical routines or algorithms, etc.

It is not appropriate to include lists of readings by topic, lists of commercial systems, or other material that does not directly support the proof of your thesis. As a rule of thumb, doctoral thesis on, a CS dissertation should probably be longer than pages, but less than Anything outside of that range should be carefully examined with the above points in mind, doctoral thesis on.

Keep in mind that you -- the Ph. candidate -- are expected to become the world's foremost expert on your topic area. That topic area should not be unduly broad, but must be big enough to be meaningful, doctoral thesis on.

Your advisor and committee members are not supposed to know more doctoral thesis on the topic than you do -- not individually, at least.

Your dissertation is supposed to explain your findings and, along with the defense, demonstrate your mastery of the doctoral thesis on in which you are now the leading expert. That does not mean writing everything you know -- it means writing enough about the most important points that others can agree with your conclusions, doctoral thesis on. Last of all, doctoral thesis on, don't fall into the trap that ties up many a candidate, and causes some of them to flame out before completion: your thesis does not need to be revolutionary.

It simply needs to be an incremental advancement in the field, doctoral thesis on. Few Ph. dissertations have ever had a marked impact on the field. Instead, it is the set of publications and products of the author that may change the field. If your dissertation is like most, doctoral thesis on, it will only be read by your committee and some other Ph. candidates seeking to build on your work. As such, it does not need to be a masterwork of literature, nor does it need to solve a long-standing problem in computing.

It merely needs to be correct, to be significant in the judgement of your committee, and it needs to be complete. We will all doctoral thesis on when you change the world after graduation.

And at that you will find that many well-known scientists in CS have made their careers in areas different from their dissertation topic. The dissertation is proof that you can find and present original results; your career and life after graduation will demonstrate the other concerns you might have about making an impact, doctoral thesis on.

Writing A PhD Thesis (you love) in 3 MONTHS - How To Write Efficiently

, time: 13:53

Properties of expanding universes

Masters/Doctoral Thesis Description. This template provides a full framework for writing a graduate level thesis. It is carefully structured and separated into multiple parts for easy editing. Included are the following pages/sections: a cover page, declaration of authorship, quotation, abstract, acknowledgements, contents page(s), list of Properties of expanding universes (Doctoral thesis). This thesis has been made openly available with the kind permission of Professor Stephen Hawking. Abstract. Some implications and consequences of the expansion of the universe are examined. In Chapter 1 it is shown that this expansion creates grave difficulties for the Hoyle-Narlikar Mar 27,  · The Gantt chart is a technique I learned in graduate school when I took project management courses. This is a hypothetical Gantt chart for my doctoral student, covering about 15 months. What I suggested to her was to use backcasting techniques to plan backwards from her goal (PhD thesis defense) to intermediate goals